I want to go shopping. Online, of course, because I’m making a conscious effort to refrain from any impulse shopping & because I can never find what I’m looking for in 100% natural fabrics without spending days in a row hopping from store to store & I usually find myself settling for something that ‘will do’ as a substitute.
In order to slow myself down, I’ve developed a habit of googling minimalism to reassure myself that I can manage with the items I have. Besides, soon I will be able to fit in some of my other items, as I’ve been working very hard on toning up and slimming down my body.
You know what I’m starting to notice during these google sessions, though? It’s that so many of these writers are using the terms ‘building your minimalist wardrobe’ – ’10 items you need for your minimalist wardrobe’ – ‘Growing a minimalist wardrobe’. Pardon my stupidity, but isn’t the whole thing about paring down? Living happily with the items you currently own? Not SHOPPING MORE????? How does this in any way fit in with actual minimalist theorems?
I don’t have a closet full of options. I did a purge about a year ago, and gave away many of the items I had that were not sustainable or natural fabrics. You may think me crazed, but these are the items I love and want to wear, so there was no use in hoarding a closet full of ‘meh’ items. However, it absolutely baffles me as to how someone could read one of these articles, give away 80% of their items, and then go shopping to replace those items with more items, but items which cost probably 70% more than the original donated item. (Let us not forget that the big advice is to buy high quality basics – which usually cost no less than 150 Euro per piece. ) Now, investing in a needed item which will last for years, I understand and agree with totally. Most times, you have to pay for quality of make & fabric. But throwing things out & then buying more really just seems like a good justification for a shopping trip to start your new life. And that just seems silly.
What do you think?